Recently, the music notation software, Finale, long considered the industry standard, announced that it would end production. Although the software would be permanently available to download, the company would longer provide upgrades, particularly when the computer operating system changed. In other words, soon Finale would be obsolete, and most probably the music created using it would no longer be accessible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58039/580399a2bbeafd441273678943793dc2a0d4b18b" alt=""
I, like many other composers, was panicked. I had used the software for over thirty years, and almost all of my music catalogue was in Finale. I had made PDF files of all my scores for ease of printing, but any re-editing or correcting had to be done on the original file.
Finale assured composers that all was not lost; music could be migrated to another notation software system. However (why is there always a however?) this entailed a lot of re-editing. Most of the dynamics had to be reentered, glissandos were all over the place, and any unconventional notation was illegible. I was looking at hours and hours of work to upgrade each piece. The prospect was daunting at best, terrifying at worst.
Of course, I was glad I wasn’t dead. That would have been a real problem.
I came to age as a composer in the mid 1970’s. To create a score, I used vellum or onion skin, a durable, semi-transparent material pre-printed with a staff. Using various well chosen pens and India ink, I would copy out my music. The manuscript was then reproduced through an ozalid process.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a276/3a2762735c238cd51d2e45155dc0dbb62eae5300" alt=""
This mode of copying was time consuming. The vellum had to be dusted with talcum powder so the ink would stick. Pen nibs needed meticulously cleaning, and mistakes were scraped off or even cut out. Once the score was created, each part needed to be copied out separately on vellum. Imagine an orchestra piece with 24-28 parts; it was a proof-reading nightmare.
When photocopiers became available, I switched to handwriting the score with pen and paper. I corrected mistakes with white-out fluid, and cut a photocopied score up and glued the parts onto separate sheets of paper. The only drawback was that the parts would constantly come unglued, often falling into a tangled mess.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46850/46850719e65e57fe6d9c96ee1e63af30427ea6e5" alt=""
I began using a computer and the Finale software in 1991 with a great sigh of relief. Quickly I learned how to key in the notes, adjusting the formatting to my own personal satisfaction. My music was now more regulated and easier to read. Parts were extracted from the score and I sent them to performers by mail, or electronically as a PDF. This was a best case scenario.
The advent of music software, coupled with direct access to the world wide web has been a great equalizer for artists. Before the internet, publishers (museums or libraries) were gate keepers. They selected artists they wanted to represent and made them ‘important.’ Now, composers became their own publishers, creating websites to publicize and sell their music directly to performers. More than that, the digital age offered artists – offered me – the taste of the promise that my work would endure, some place in the big somewhere. That my work would survive and have a life beyond mine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c65fd/c65fd789d8ac2f0dcbab85853e4337e88ad526ce" alt=""
Artists are always concerned with the preservation of the works they have created over a life time. First, will the material used – the paper or ink – stand the test of time? Secondly, how will the works continue to get out to the public? Are there publishers who will make the music available to performing ensembles after the death of the artist? Are there libraries, museums, or archives that will store and protect the work?
We live in a time of diminishing resources to safeguard the legacy of music created by American composers. We have no national repository in the way that other countries have. Canada, for example, has a library of all its composers’ works available to view, study or perform. In other words they honor and treasure their country’s artists; the US does not. And publishers have neither the financial resources nor the interest in representing composers that are not currently successful.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf5f2/bf5f2626b407a4fbabe1ecacc8d1f637e5bd287e" alt=""
The internet and the availability of music in a viable software system is of great importance; it will house, remember, preserve, and make available works of all composers – so that this generation of composers, who speak of our time, will be remembered.
The Finale-end-of-the-road reminds me of the false promise in terms of permanence. I look at my music paper with renewed fondness.